首页> 外文OA文献 >Tanggung Jawab dan Upaya Penyelesaian Perselisihan antara PT Pertamina (Persero) dengan Pihak SPBU dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Pendistribusian Bahan Bakar Minyak di Kota Kendari
【2h】

Tanggung Jawab dan Upaya Penyelesaian Perselisihan antara PT Pertamina (Persero) dengan Pihak SPBU dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Pendistribusian Bahan Bakar Minyak di Kota Kendari

机译:解决PT Pertamina(Persero)与加油站之间的纠纷的责任和努力,以在肯达里市执行燃料分配协议

摘要

Author raised the issue about form of responsibility and dispute resolution efforts PT Pertamina with the filling stations in the implementation of Fuel Distribution Agreement, while the form of an agreement between two parties is a kind of standard contract which it created and defined by the party dominates, namely PT Pertamina, so often have problems in implementing the agreement that has been agreed upon by both parties, One is in default which resulted in one of the parties should be responsible for problems that arise. The existence of some of the contents of the agreement are not properly implemented, will impact a loss for the other party, so as to overcome this is necessary to responsibility and remedies that must be done to overcome the existing problems. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the form of responsibility and remedies undertaken by PT Pertamina (Persero) in the event of a default problems in implementing the distribution of fuel to the General Fuel Station in Kendari city. The research by the author using socio-juridical where researchers looked at the facts that occurred in the field and examined by reference to the letter of the law and existing agreements. Results of this study concluded that in implementing the agreement, especially regarding the implementation of rights and obligations, still found a common problem that, PT Pertamina provide some ways that can be done as a form of responsibility to resolve the existing problems. As for the remedies to be taken in the event of a dispute related to the existing problems, can be done with two options, namely, by deliberation and litigation (court), as agreed in the contents of the agreement. Thus, to solve this problem required cooperation by all parties concerned. Both the PT Pertamina, gas stations, and Local Government.
机译:作者提出了与执行加油站有关的责任形式和争端解决工作PT Pertamina在执行《燃料分配协议》方面的问题,而两方之间的协议形式则是由该方创建和定义的一种标准合同,即PT Pertamina,在执行双方达成的协议时经常会遇到问题。一个默认情况下,导致一方应对出现的问题负责。协议中某些内容的存在不能正确执行,将影响另一方的损失,从而克服这一点是必须承担的责任和为克服现有问题而必须采取的补救措施。这项研究的目的是确定和分析PT Pertamina(Persero)采取的责任形式和补救措施,以防在实施向肯达里市通用加油站分配燃料时出现默认问题。作者使用社会法学进行的研究,研究人员研究了该领域发生的事实,并参考了法律条文和现有协议进行了审查。这项研究的结果得出结论,在执行协议时,特别是在权利和义务的执行方面,仍然发现一个普遍的问题,PT Pertamina提供了一些可以作为解决现有问题的责任形式的方式。至于在与现有问题有关的纠纷中应采取的补救措施,可以采用两种选择,即按照协议内容商定的方式进行审议和诉讼(法院)。因此,解决这个问题需要有关各方的合作。 PT Pertamina,加油站和地方政府都有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号